Go to the first, previous, next, last section, table of contents.


Input/Output from BEGIN and END Rules

There are several (sometimes subtle) issues involved when doing I/O from a BEGIN or END rule.

The first has to do with the value of $0 in a BEGIN rule. Since BEGIN rules are executed before any input is read, there simply is no input record, and therefore no fields, when executing BEGIN rules. References to $0 and the fields yield a null string or zero, depending upon the context. One way to give $0 a real value is to execute a getline command without a variable (see section Explicit Input with getline). Another way is to simply assign a value to it.

The second point is similar to the first, but from the other direction. Inside an END rule, what is the value of $0 and NF? Traditionally, due largely to implementation issues, $0 and NF were undefined inside an END rule. The POSIX standard specified that NF was available in an END rule, containing the number of fields from the last input record. Due most probably to an oversight, the standard does not say that $0 is also preserved, although logically one would think that it should be. In fact, gawk does preserve the value of $0 for use in END rules. Be aware, however, that Unix awk, and possibly other implementations, do not.

The third point follows from the first two. What is the meaning of `print' inside a BEGIN or END rule? The meaning is the same as always, `print $0'. If $0 is the null string, then this prints an empty line. Many long time awk programmers use `print' in BEGIN and END rules, to mean `print ""', relying on $0 being null. While you might generally get away with this in BEGIN rules, in gawk at least, it is a very bad idea in END rules. It is also poor style, since if you want an empty line in the output, you should say so explicitly in your program.


Go to the first, previous, next, last section, table of contents.